top of page
Search

AI Data Centres’ Hidden Thirst: Billions of Gallons of Water at Stake

AI’s Hidden Thirst: Data-Centre Water Use Emerges as a Critical Sustainability Challenge


By the Green Fuel Journal Research Division  Author Credit: News Analysis Team — Green Fuel Journal   Date of Review: October 31, 2025

Original News Article Link: https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-water-usage


1. News Summary

The recent article from IEEE Spectrum highlights that large-scale data centres supporting artificial intelligence workloads consume substantial volumes of fresh water — both directly for cooling and indirectly via power generation. In the United States alone, data-centre direct water consumption in 2023 is estimated at ~17.5 billion gallons, with withdrawal potentially 35 billion gallons based on estimated 50% consumption rates. IEEE Spectrum Importantly, nearly 2-thirds of new U.S. data centres built since 2022 are located in high water-stress regions, raising concerns about local water supply impact. IEEE Spectrum The article outlines strategies such as immersive cooling, closed-loop systems, and localisation in wetter grids to reduce water footprints.


Bright white Data centers with Neatly arranged. Modern, clean, and organized environment.

2. The Analysis

This article marks a pivotal moment: it moves water usage from a niche “sustainability metric” to a core operational risk for AI/data-centre roll-out. There are several layers to unpack:


  • Direct vs Indirect Water Use: Direct use (onsite cooling) is visible and measurable. According to the article, data centres use cooling towers or evaporative systems where 45-60% of withdrawal may be consumed. IEEE Spectrum But far larger is the indirect water embedded in electricity generation (thermoelectric power plants withdraw and consume large volumes of water to produce the electricity feeding AI). The article cites that for many U.S. data centres, indirect water use exceeds direct use. This duality means any mitigation strategy must account for both on-site operations and upstream power-supply chain.

  • Geographic stress and timing risk: Although the national aggregate appears modest (~0.3% of U.S. public water supply) IEEE Spectrum, the problem is far more acute regionally. In drought-prone or water-scarce localities, a single data-centre’s daily water demand may rival or exceed the daily water use of a small county. On hot days (when municipal water demand peaks), data-centre water demand often spikes — compounding stress. This timing mismatch creates systemic vulnerability.

  • Technology and design trade-offs: The article outlines alternative cooling approaches — air-based, liquid immersion, recycled/reclaimed water loops, zero-water designs — which come with trade-offs: higher electricity demand, higher capital cost, or new operational risks. For example, immersion cooling eliminates evaporative water use but adds electrical load (and thus, potentially more indirect water via electricity supply) and complexity. The article is clear: there is no free lunch; water, energy, and cost are all interlinked.

  • Strategic implication for scale-up: Given the rapid growth trajectory of AI and data centres, the water footprint becomes not just an operational refinement but a strategic bottleneck. If today’s water-intensive designs are replicated across global expansion, we risk constraining growth via resource availability rather than compute demand. The article indirectly signals that water may become the limiting factor before energy or carbon emissions in certain geographies.


3. Key Takeaways

  • Large AI/data-centre facilities in the U.S. consumed ~17.5 billion gallons of water in 2023 (direct use) and withdrew up to ~35 billion gallons when consumption ratios are considered.

  • Approximately two-thirds of U.S. data centres built since 2022 are in water-stressed regions, amplifying local risk.

  • Mitigation options (zero-water cooling, closed loops, immersion) exist but often increase electricity demand and capital cost — shifting the burden rather than eliminating it.

  • The water-use issue is not just operational but strategic: it intersects with siting, regional infrastructure, supply-chain design, and sustainability credentials.

  • For business and infrastructure planners, water resource planning will need to become integral in data-centre development (historically energy-centric) to avoid bottlenecks and reputational risk.


4. Future Outlook & Implications


Short to mid-term (2025-2030):Data-centre developers will increasingly favour locations with plentiful water access, cooler climates, or access to reclaimed/industrial wastewater. Companies may face regulatory scrutiny or community push-back in water-sensitive geographies. Contracts for water use, local infrastructure contributions (water-storage, treatment) and peak-demand mitigation will become part of site selection. Also, expect to see growth in investor criteria and ESG metrics focused on water-use effectiveness (WUE) alongside energy metrics (PUE).


Longer-term (2030 and beyond):If AI/data-centre demand continues exponential growth, water constraints may force new architectural shifts: immersion cooling, desalination-linked sites, co-location with industrial/thermal power waste heat systems. Regions unable to secure sustainable water supply may become less competitive, redirecting investment to jurisdictions with integrated water-energy-digital ecosystems. Also, the interlinked nature of water and energy supply means policy, urban planning and utilities must integrate digital-infrastructure demands in resource planning — making the “digital economy water footprint” a mainstream planning category.


Winners & losers:Winners will be operators and locations that adopt low-water-footprint designs early, secure diversified water sources (including recycled or non-potable), and align siting with sustainable resource availability. Losers risk stranded assets, regulatory delays, community opposition, or reputational damage. Investors ignoring water risk may underestimate capital exposure and operational disruption.


5. Recommendations / Expert View

For Corporate Strategy & Data-Centre Operators:

  • Integrate water-use planning into the earliest phase of site selection — just as you would energy supply or cooling infrastructure.

  • Adopt zero- or low-water cooling designs where feasible and couple with renewable electricity to minimise indirect water use and carbon footprint.

  • Engage local communities and utilities proactively — invest in local water infrastructure or storage to avoid adversarial siting conflicts.


For Policymakers & Regulators:

  • Update regulatory frameworks to require disclosure of both direct and indirect water use for large data centres; standardise metrics such as WUE (litres per kWh).

  • Provide incentives (tax, permitting priority) for data-centre designs that use non-potable water, recycled water, or have closed-loop cooling systems.

  • Align urban/regional water-energy-digital planning: treat digital infrastructure as a water-resource consumer in regional planning, not just as an add-on.


For Investors & Infrastructure Financiers:

  • Evaluate water‐risk alongside energy and carbon risk when assessing data-centre investments. Sites in water-scarce regions without mitigation should carry a higher cost of equity or risk premium.

  • Encourage disclosure of water metrics and require strategic road-maps for water-footprint reduction in annual filings.

  • Support innovation in cooling technologies, water reuse/recycling systems, and integration of water supply into digital infrastructure LOIs (letters of intent).


Strategic insight: The water footprint of AI and data centres is shifting from a marginal environmental footnote to a core strategic lever. Organisations that recognise and proactively manage water-resource constraints — both onsite and upstream — will unlock sustained competitive advantage in the accelerating digital economy.


References & Disclaimer

References:


Disclaimer: This news analysis is intended for informational and educational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure factual accuracy, the author and publisher do not guarantee completeness or reliability. Opinions expressed reflect the author’s analysis and are not financial, investment or policy advice. Read complete Disclaimer


News Analysis - Green Fuel Journal

Comments

bottom of page