top of page
Search

Lake Turkana Wind Power Project: Technical, Economic & Policy Analysis of Africa's Largest Wind Farm

Lake Turkana Wind Power Project – A Comprehensive Renewable Energy Case Study


In the remote, arid expanse of Marsabit County in northern Kenya, 365 Vestas turbines stand as sentinels of renewable energy transformation. The Lake Turkana Wind Power Project (LTWP), with its 310 MW capacity, represents not merely an engineering accomplishment but a watershed moment for African wind infrastructure.


This Kenya renewable energy case study examines how a $680 million private investment became Africa's largest wind farm while navigating complex grid integration challenges, financing structures, and community relations in one of the continent's most isolated regions.


Lake Turkana Wind Power Project

The lake turkana wind power project began delivering electrons to Kenya Power in 2018, though its journey from conception in 2005 to commercial operation spanned nearly 15 years. Located 545 kilometers north of Nairobi near the eastern shores of Lake Turkana, this Marsabit County wind farm harnesses the persistent Turkana jet winds that funnel through the Rift Valley with an average speed of 11 meters per second.


The project's capacity factor of approximately 60%—reaching 75.8% in March 2021—dramatically exceeds the global average of 30-40%, demonstrating the exceptional quality of Kenya's wind resource.



What Is the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project?


The Lake Turkana Wind Power Project is a 310 MW wind farm comprising 365 Vestas V52-850kW turbines located in Loiyangalani District, Marsabit County, Kenya.


Operational since September 2018 after completing grid connection, it represents the single largest private investment in Kenya's history at approximately $680 million and currently supplies 10-12% of Kenya's national grid capacity.


The project covers 40,000 acres (160 square kilometers) of semi-arid land approximately 50 kilometers north of South Horr Township and 8 kilometers east of Lake Turkana. Each of the 365 wind turbines has a capacity of 850 kW, mounted on towers extending 44 meters high with rotor diameters of 52 meters. The wind farm infrastructure includes a 33 kV overhead electric grid collection system that transmits power to an on-site 220 kV substation.


Lake Turkana Wind Power Project overview showing 310 MW capacity, 365 turbines, 60% capacity factor, and key technical specifications

From this substation, electricity flows through a 438-kilometer, 400 kV double-circuit transmission line to Suswa substation near Naivasha, where it integrates into Kenya's national grid.


The project operates under a 20-year Power Purchase Agreement with Kenya Power and Lighting Company (KPLC), which purchases electricity at a fixed tariff of approximately $0.081 per kWh (Ksh 8.6 at 2017 exchange rates).

Lake Turkana Wind Power Limited, the special purpose vehicle that owns and operates the facility, involves four primary shareholders:

  • Anergi Turkana Investments Limited (43.2%),

  • Osprey Renewables Africa (31.25%),

  • CFP UK Holdings Limited (managed by BlackRock, 25.25%), and

  • Sandpiper Ltd (0.3%).


The ownership structure has evolved since financial close in 2014, with early investors including Norfund, Finnfund, IFU, and Vestas gradually transferring their stakes to long-term infrastructure investors.



Why Was the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project Developed?


Kenya faced critical energy deficits prior to 2019, with heavy reliance on drought-prone hydropower (46.3% of capacity) and expensive thermal generation from diesel and heavy fuel oil (37.4% of capacity).


The project addresses energy security concerns, reduces fossil fuel import dependence costing Kenya $150 million annually, and advances the Kenya Vision 2030 renewable energy targets.


Before LTWP came online, Kenya's electricity generation faced severe vulnerabilities. The country's dependence on hydropower meant that prolonged droughts—increasingly frequent due to climate variability—resulted in electricity shortages and expensive thermal backup generation. Diesel and heavy fuel oil plants required Ksh 17 billion (approximately $150 million) in annual fuel imports, exposing Kenya to volatile international oil prices and foreign exchange risks.


The Kenya Vision 2030 development blueprint, launched in 2008, identified energy as a fundamental enabler of economic transformation.

The plan called for increasing installed generation capacity from 1,113 MW in 2008 to 5,000 MW by 2017, with renewable sources forming the backbone of this expansion. LTWP was designated as a flagship project within this framework, expected to deliver approximately 20% of Kenya's installed capacity at the time of conception.


The project's climate mitigation impact aligns with Kenya's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement, which commits the country to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 32% by 2030 and achieving 100% clean energy generation.

Beyond environmental imperatives, the Private-Public energy partnership Africa model demonstrated that large-scale renewable infrastructure could attract international development finance to Sub-Saharan markets historically perceived as high-risk.


The choice of wind power specifically addressed Kenya's generation mix vulnerabilities. Unlike hydropower, wind resources in the Lake Turkana corridor remain consistent year-round, providing baseload reliability. Unlike geothermal development, which requires extensive exploration and drilling, wind resources could be measured and verified through relatively straightforward wind assessment studies that LTWP conducted over six years before construction.



Where Is the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project Located and Why Is the Wind Resource Unique?


The Lake Turkana Wind Power Project is positioned in a unique meteorological corridor where the low-level Turkana jet creates exceptionally consistent winds.


Located between Mount Kulal (2,300m) and Mount Nyiru Range (2,750m), the site experiences accelerated wind streams caused by the pressure differential between Lake Turkana's relatively temperate microclimate and the surrounding desert highlands, producing average wind speeds of 11 m/s with capacity factors exceeding 60%.


The wind corridor effect at Lake Turkana results from large-scale atmospheric phenomena combined with local topographical features. The East African low-level jet, a persistent wind pattern that extends from the Indian Ocean through the Rift Valley to Sudan, creates the foundation for this exceptional resource.

Dr. Kinuthia of the Kenyan Meteorological Department documented how this jet stream flows year-round from the southeast, channeled through the valley between the East African highlands and Ethiopian highlands.


Local acceleration occurs as these winds encounter the natural funnel formed by Mount Kulal and Mount Nyiru Range. The Rift Valley topography creates what aerodynamicists call a Venturi effect—as wind compresses through the narrowing valley, its velocity increases dramatically.

Additionally, thermal effects create diurnal variation patterns: wind speeds peak during nighttime hours when temperature differentials between the lake and surrounding desert reach their maximum, then moderate during midday heating.


This produces a capacity factor—the ratio of actual power output to maximum possible output—that averages approximately 60% at LTWP. In March 2021, the facility recorded its highest monthly capacity factor of 75.8%, demonstrating the resource's exceptional quality.

For context, most European onshore wind farms operate at capacity factors of 25-35%, while typical U.S. facilities achieve 30-40%. The Lake Turkana wind resource thus represents one of the world's most productive wind regimes for commercial-scale generation.


The consistency of the wind resource—blowing at commercially viable speeds throughout all seasons—eliminates the intermittency challenges that plague many wind installations.

While wind farms in temperate climates experience significant seasonal variation and often require fossil fuel backup during low-wind periods, LTWP generates electricity approximately 70% of the time, providing near-baseload reliability comparable to thermal plants.


This meteorological advantage directly translates into economic performance. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) from LTWP—approximately $0.081/kWh—compares favorably against Kenya's short-term marginal generation costs, which ranged from $0.128-$0.226/kWh for thermal plants according to the 2010 Least Cost Power Development Plan. Even factoring in transmission costs of approximately $0.01/kWh, wind power from Lake Turkana substantially undercuts diesel and heavy fuel oil generation.



What Are the Technical Specifications of the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project?


The project employs 365 Vestas V52-850kW turbines, each rated at 850 kW with 52-meter rotor diameters mounted on 44-meter towers, for total installed capacity of 310.25 MW.


The wind farm connects to a 220 kV substation that feeds into a 438-kilometer, 400 kV double-circuit transmission line with 1,200 MW capacity, designed to evacuate power from future renewable projects in northern Kenya.


The selection of Vestas V52-850kW turbines—smaller units compared to modern multi-megawatt machines—resulted from careful logistical and engineering analysis. Vestas Wind Systems supplied all 365 turbines, manufactured at their facilities in China, with components transported 1,200 kilometers by road from Mombasa port to the remote Loiyangalani site. Larger turbines would have created insurmountable transportation challenges on the narrow, winding roads through Marsabit's harsh terrain.


Additionally, the high average wind speeds at Lake Turkana favored smaller turbines designed for high-wind regimes. Modern large turbines optimize for lower wind speeds common in European and North American markets; their longer blades and larger swept areas would experience excessive stress in the consistently strong Turkana winds, potentially reducing equipment lifespan and increasing maintenance costs.


Each turbine's nacelle—the housing containing the generator and gearbox—sits atop a 44-meter tower, with three blades sweeping a 52-meter diameter circle. The turbines begin generating at wind speeds of approximately 3.5 m/s and reach rated capacity around 14 m/s, with automatic shutdown at wind speeds exceeding 25 m/s to prevent structural damage.


The 33 kV collection system aggregates power from individual turbines through an underground and overhead cable network spanning the 40,000-acre site. This medium-voltage electricity flows to the central substation where transformers step voltage up to 220 kV for long-distance transmission. The substation includes switchgear, protection systems, and control equipment that manage power quality and coordinate with the national grid operator.


Grid evacuation constraints represented perhaps the project's most significant technical challenge—ultimately causing more than a year of delay. The Kenya Electricity Transmission Company (KETRACO) constructed the 438-kilometer transmission line from Loiyangalani to Suswa, traversing some of Kenya's most difficult terrain including desert, mountains, and areas with security concerns.


The transmission infrastructure employs a 400 kV double-circuit design, providing redundancy and substantial headroom beyond LTWP's immediate needs. The line's 1,200 MW capacity allows for future expansion of renewable generation in northern Kenya, including potential solar farms and additional wind projects. The double-circuit configuration ensures that maintenance on one circuit doesn't require complete shutdown of power evacuation from LTWP.


Vestas also provides operations and maintenance (O&M) services under a 15-year contract beginning in 2018. This arrangement ensures access to manufacturer expertise and spare parts inventory critical for maintaining availability in such a remote location. The O&M team monitors turbine performance through SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems, enabling predictive maintenance and rapid response to equipment issues.


In 2021, LTWP contracted Clir Renewables, a Canadian software company, to implement advanced analytics across all 365 turbines. This system analyzes wind speed fluctuations at each turbine location, identifies underperformance patterns, and suggests optimization strategies—representing the adoption of industry-leading asset management practices even in frontier markets.



How Was the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project Financed?


The $680 million project achieved financial close in December 2014 through a complex structure comprising 70% senior debt, 25% equity, and 5% mezzanine debt.


The African Development Bank served as mandated lead arranger for approximately €436 million in senior loans, with the European Investment Bank providing €200 million and 11 additional development finance institutions and commercial banks participating in the syndicated package.


The financing architecture for LTWP represents one of the most sophisticated Private-Public energy partnership Africa structures executed to date. Total project costs of approximately $680 million (some sources cite up to $700 million) included turbine supply and installation, substation construction, 200 kilometers of road rehabilitation, and development costs accumulated over nearly a decade of project preparation.


Financing Structure Breakdown:

Component

Percentage

Approximate Value

Key Providers

Senior Debt

70%

~$476 million

AfDB (€436M), EIB (€200M), Standard Bank, Nedbank

Equity

25%

~$170 million

KP&P, Aldwych, Norfund, Finnfund, IFU, others

Mezzanine Debt

5%

~$34 million

AfDB (€37.5M subordinated)

Lake Turkana financing structure: $680M split into 70% senior debt, 25% equity, 5% mezzanine debt with AfDB and EIB as lead arrangers

The African Development Bank (AfDB) arranged approximately €436 million of senior loan facilities plus €37.5 million of subordinated (mezzanine) debt, demonstrating the institution's catalytic role in mobilizing private capital to frontier markets.


The European Investment Bank (EIB) contributed €200 million, with additional senior debt from Standard Bank and Nedbank of South Africa, FMO (Netherlands Development Finance Company), Proparco (French development finance), EADB (East African Development Bank), PTA Bank, DEG (German development finance), Triodos, and EKF (Danish export credit agency).


The European Union provided a €25 million grant through the EU-Africa Infrastructure Trust Fund, with an additional €10 million grant from the Government of the Netherlands. These concessional funds proved crucial in closing the project's financing gap, as purely commercial terms would have rendered the project financially unviable given perceived risks.


The sovereign guarantee mechanism emerged as perhaps the most critical—and contentious—risk allocation tool. The Kenyan government provided guarantees ensuring that Kenya Power would meet its Power Purchase Agreement payment obligations regardless of operational circumstances. This sovereign backing proved essential for attracting development finance and commercial debt at acceptable rates.


The World Bank initially engaged with the project but withdrew in 2012, citing concerns about potential excess generation capacity relative to Kenya's demand growth. World Bank Country Director Johannes Zutt warned that Kenya could face Ksh 8.5 billion (approximately $100 million) annually in excess power costs. However, this withdrawal ultimately accelerated the project toward financial close, as remaining lenders moved forward without World Bank conditionalities.


The Power Purchase Agreement fixed LTWP's tariff at approximately $0.081/kWh (Ksh 8.6/kWh in 2017 terms) for 20 years, providing revenue certainty that enabled the debt financing. This take-or-pay structure obligated Kenya Power to purchase all electricity generated by LTWP regardless of demand conditions, transferring demand risk from the private developer to the public offtaker.


The LCOE calculation for LTWP incorporates capital costs, operations and maintenance expenses, and the project's expected 20-year operational life. While the $0.081/kWh tariff appears higher than some conventional generation sources on a pure cost basis, it delivers significant value when considering fuel price stability, emissions avoidance, and displacement of imported petroleum products.




What Challenges Did the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project Face?


The transmission line delay emerged as the project's defining challenge, costing Kenyan taxpayers between Ksh 5.7 billion and Ksh 18.5 billion in deemed generated energy payments.


The government-contracted Spanish firm Isolux Corsán filed for insolvency in March 2017 after completing only half the 438-kilometer line, forcing contract termination and emergency retendering to Chinese firms NARI Group and PowerChina Guiyang Engineering, who completed the remaining work in eight months under penalty of Ksh 1.3 billion per month for delays.


Originally, LTWP planned to construct both the wind farm and transmission line as an integrated project. However, in a fateful 2011 decision, the Kenyan government amended the Power Purchase Agreement to assign transmission responsibility to KETRACO, the state-owned transmission company. This decision, which Parliamentary investigations later questioned as potentially corrupt, created a critical interdependency that ultimately cost billions.


KETRACO awarded the transmission contract to Isolux Corsán, a Spanish engineering firm, in December 2011 with an expected completion date of October 2016. The €208 million contract called for constructing the 438-kilometer, 400 kV double-circuit line through challenging terrain including desert regions, mountainous areas, and territories with security concerns.


Several factors converged to derail the transmission project:


1. Wayleave Acquisition Challenges: KETRACO struggled to secure right-of-way permissions from landowners along the 438-kilometer route. Compensation disputes, land tenure complexities, and opportunistic claims delayed progress significantly.

Reports emerged of traditional homes (manyattas) "sprouting overnight" along the transmission route as community members sought compensation payments.


2. Contractor Financial Distress: Isolux Corsán encountered severe financial difficulties beginning in 2016, coinciding with Spain's economic recession.

The company filed for insolvency in March 2017 after completing approximately 50% of the transmission line and receiving Ksh 10.8 billion of the Ksh 17.4 billion contract value.


3. Curtailment Risk and Deemed Generated Energy: Meanwhile, LTWP completed wind farm construction on schedule, with all 365 turbines erected by March 2017 and the facility ready for commercial operation by June 2017. However, with no transmission line to evacuate power, the wind farm sat idle while winds continued blowing.


The Power Purchase Agreement included a "Deemed Generated Energy" (DGE) clause designed to protect LTWP from losses caused by transmission delays outside their control. Under this provision, Kenya Power was obligated to pay for electricity that LTWP could have generated but couldn't evacuate due to transmission unavailability.


From January 2017 (when LTWP completed the wind farm) through September 2018 (when transmission finally came online), the government paid capacity charges totaling between Ksh 5.7 billion and Ksh 18.5 billion depending on the source. Initial reports cited Ksh 5.7 billion in a 2017 negotiated settlement, but subsequent parliamentary audits identified total payments approaching Ksh 18.5 billion when accounting for all deemed generation periods.


Monthly capacity charges of Ksh 700 million (approximately $7 million) began in January 2017, with LTWP waiving the first four months as a goodwill gesture. The government negotiated to spread payments over six years at Ksh 78.6 million monthly, with costs ultimately passed to electricity consumers through tariff adjustments beginning in May 2018.


4. Emergency Transmission Completion: In August 2017, KETRACO terminated the Isolux contract and emergency-tendered the remaining work to a consortium of NARI Group Corporation and PowerChina Guizhou Engineering. The Chinese firms received an aggressive eight-month deadline with penalties of Ksh 1.3 billion per month for delays beyond September 1, 2018.


Working around the clock in harsh conditions including extreme heat, flash flood risks, and wildlife dangers, the consortium completed what Isolux had failed to accomplish in three years. The transmission line energized its first circuit on September 20, 2018, allowing LTWP to begin hot commissioning. President Uhuru Kenyatta officially inaugurated the completed project on July 19, 2019.


Lake Turkana Wind Power 15-year timeline from 2005 inception to 2019 inauguration highlighting transmission delay crisis and Ksh 18.5B deemed energy costs

5. Community Relations and Land Disputes: Social challenges paralleled technical obstacles. Local communities, including El Molo, Rendille, Samburu, and Turkana pastoralist groups, filed lawsuits beginning in October 2014 challenging the land acquisition process. The Sarima Indigenous Peoples' Land Forum (SIPLF), formed in 2015, protested what they characterized as illegal privatization of 610 square kilometers of community land.


The Meru High Court rejected applications to halt the project in November 2016, ruling that LTWP held valid land permits. However, the conflict underscored inadequate early consultation—many community members reportedly learned about the project only in April 2014, despite land permits being signed in March 2009.


LTWP's Winds of Change Foundation has sought to address community concerns through development projects in health, education, water access, and infrastructure. The foundation commits €500,000 annually (increased to €750,000 in 2024), funding over 100 community projects to date. Approximately 1,180 people from Sarima village were relocated and compensated with Ksh 13,000 (approximately €113) per household, though some community members have characterized this as inadequate.



What Is the Economic Impact of the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project on Kenya?


LTWP supplied 1,367 GWh to Kenya's national grid in 2024, representing 10.89% of the country's total generation.


Since commencing operations in 2018, the project has contributed over 9.5 billion kWh, displaced approximately Ksh 167 billion (~$1.15 billion) worth of fuel imports through 2024, created over 300 permanent jobs (80% from Marsabit County), and improved regional infrastructure through 200 kilometers of road upgrades and fiber optic connectivity.


The project's grid contribution has evolved as Kenya's installed capacity expanded. Initially expected to provide 15-17% of installed capacity, LTWP now supplies 10-12% as geothermal, solar, and additional wind capacity have come online. In 2024, the facility generated 1,367 GWh, accounting for 10.89% of Kenya's total generation.


The Load factor—actual generation relative to maximum possible output—averaged approximately 50% in 2024, reflecting both the excellent wind resource and occasional grid constraints. During peak wind periods, LTWP can generate nearly 200 MW continuously for days, but curtailment risk occasionally forces generation reduction when grid demand cannot absorb all available renewable power.


Economic Benefits Analysis:

Impact Category

Quantified Benefit

Timeframe

Electricity Generated

9.5 billion kWh

2018-2024 cumulative

Annual Generation (2024)

1,367 GWh

Single year

Grid Contribution

10.89%

2024 average

Fuel Import Displacement

Ksh 167 billion (~$1.15 billion)

2018-2024 cumulative

Annual Fuel Savings

~€90 million

Recent estimates

Jobs Created (Construction)

~2,500

2014-2017

Permanent Employment

330+ (85% local)

Current

Community Investment

€6.5 million

2015-2024 cumulative

Lake Turkana 2024 performance: 1,367 GWh generated, 574,547 tonnes CO2 avoided, Ksh 167B fuel savings, and 330 permanent jobs created

The displacement of thermal generation represents LTWP's most significant economic contribution. Before the project, Kenya relied heavily on diesel and heavy fuel oil plants costing approximately $150 million annually in fuel imports. LTWP's consistent generation—averaging approximately 1,400-1,500 GWh annually—directly reduces the runtime of these expensive thermal facilities.


The €90 million in annual diesel and heavy fuel oil displacement savings (approximately Ksh 13 billion at current exchange rates) accumulates to €533 million from 2018 through September 2024 according to project sustainability reports. These savings benefit both the government budget (reducing foreign exchange pressure) and electricity consumers (enabling lower tariffs than would otherwise be required).


The price stabilization effect extends beyond direct fuel savings. Kenya's electricity sector previously faced severe tariff volatility driven by international oil price fluctuations and drought-induced hydropower shortages. LTWP's fixed 20-year tariff of $0.081/kWh provides predictable costs independent of global commodity markets, enabling better long-term planning for both utilities and large industrial consumers.


Job creation occurred in two phases. Construction employment peaked at approximately 2,500 workers between 2014 and 2017, with 75% drawn from local communities in Marsabit County. This provided crucial income injection in one of Kenya's most economically marginalized regions.


Permanent operations employment stands at approximately 330 positions currently, with 80-85% from Marsabit County, 15-19% from elsewhere in Kenya, and only 3 expatriates. This represents LTWP as the largest non-governmental employer in Marsabit, creating stable careers in technical, operations, maintenance, administration, and security roles.


The infrastructure spillover effects may ultimately prove as valuable as direct electricity generation. The rehabilitation of 200 kilometers of road from Laisamis to the wind farm site dramatically improved connectivity for remote communities. Travel times decreased, transportation costs fell, and market access for local livestock and fish products expanded significantly.


The transmission line includes fiber optic cable infrastructure enabling broadband connectivity in areas that previously lacked telecommunications access. Under arrangements between KETRACO and internet service providers, this infrastructure supports digital inclusion in northern Kenya.


Tax revenue contributions add another economic dimension. LTWP pays corporate income tax, VAT, and import duties, with estimates suggesting approximately Ksh 3 billion ($35 million) annually in direct and indirect tax generation over the project's 20-year life, totaling Ksh 60 billion ($690 million) in present value terms.



What Is the Environmental Impact of the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project?


LTWP avoided approximately 574,547 tonnes of CO2 emissions in 2024 alone, with cumulative emissions avoidance since 2018 exceeding 3.5 million tonnes. T


he project's 9.5 billion kWh of clean generation through 2024 eliminates greenhouse gases equivalent to planting 19 million tree seedlings over 10 years. Environmental management includes comprehensive bird migration studies, minimal water consumption in an arid region, and alignment with Kenya's NDC target of 32% emissions reduction by 2030.


The carbon footprint reduction represents LTWP's primary environmental benefit. Each kilowatt-hour generated by wind displaces what would otherwise come from fossil fuel sources—primarily diesel and heavy fuel oil thermal plants that Kenya activated during peak demand or hydropower shortages.


Emissions calculations compare LTWP's generation against the grid displacement factor—the weighted average emissions intensity of the marginal generation sources that wind power replaces. For Kenya's grid, this factor approximates 0.42 kg CO2 per kWh from thermal plants, though some calculations use more conservative estimates around 0.35-0.40 kg CO2/kWh accounting for the grid mix.


Environmental Impact Metrics:

Environmental Indicator

2024 Performance

Cumulative (2018-2024)

CO2 Emissions Avoided

574,547 tonnes

~3.5 million tonnes

Annual Generation

1,367 GWh

9.5 billion kWh

Tree Equivalency

N/A

19 million seedlings (10-yr)

Water Consumption

Minimal (turbine cleaning only)

Negligible impact

Land Footprint

40,000 acres (turbine spacing)

Compatible with pastoralism

The Climate mitigation impact aligns directly with Kenya's international commitments. The country's Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement target 32% greenhouse gas reduction by 2030 and 100% clean energy generation. LTWP's contribution of 10-12% of grid supply represents substantial progress toward these goals.


Beyond carbon, the project's biodiversity considerations received extensive study during development. A 12-month ornithological survey assessed bird migration patterns and collision risks. The wind farm sits at least 9 kilometers from Lake Turkana's shore, minimizing impacts on waterfowl populations that concentrate near the lake.


Annual environmental audits monitor bird strikes, habitat disruption, and ecosystem changes throughout the operational period. Lake Turkana hosts significant migratory bird populations along the East African Flyway, making collision monitoring essential. To date, observed bird mortality rates fall within ranges typical for wind farms globally, though continuous monitoring ensures early detection of any concerning patterns.


The water footprint remains minimal—a crucial consideration in an arid region experiencing water scarcity. Unlike thermal plants requiring cooling water or hydropower dependent on water flows, wind turbines consume essentially no water except for occasional blade cleaning and equipment cooling in modest quantities. This "dry" generation mode imposes no additional stress on Lake Turkana or groundwater resources.


However, environmental trade-offs exist. The land footprint of 40,000 acres affects pastoralist communities' traditional grazing territories, though turbine spacing permits continued livestock movement between installations. Wind farm infrastructure—including roads, the substation, and turbine foundations—creates permanent landscape alteration in a previously undeveloped region.


LTWP addresses environmental stewardship through its 2024 sustainability initiatives, including planting 528 trees and promoting conservation toward Kenya's 30% tree cover target by 2032. The Winds of Change Foundation sponsors environmental education programs in local schools, building awareness of climate issues and renewable energy benefits among Marsabit youth.



How Does the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project Compare to Other African Wind Farms?


LTWP's 310 MW capacity ranks as Africa's largest single wind farm, though Egypt's combined Gulf of Suez facilities (Zafarana 545 MW, Ras Ghareb 262.5 MW, West Bakr 250 MW) total over 1,000 MW across multiple projects. Morocco's Tarfaya Wind Farm (301 MW) represents the second-largest single facility.


LTWP distinguishes itself through exceptional 60% capacity factor, comprehensive private financing without sovereign equity, and operation in a frontier market with limited renewable energy infrastructure.


African Wind Farm Comparison:

Project

Country

Capacity (MW)

Turbines

Operational

Key Features

Lake Turkana

Kenya

310

365

2018

Highest capacity factor (~60%), 100% private equity

Zafarana

Egypt

545

700

2000-2010

Eight phases, Gulf of Suez location

Tarfaya

Morocco

301

131

2014

Saharan desert, 900K tonnes CO2 savings annually

Ras Ghareb

Egypt

262.5

125

2019

~60% capacity factor, IPP model

West Bakr

Egypt

250

96

2021

Lekela Power development

Adama I & II

Ethiopia

204

102

2015-2016

Chinese EPC contractor

Taiba N'Diaye

Senegal

158.7

46

2020

EU-backed, 15% of Senegal's power

The investment models reveal important distinctions. Egypt's wind projects largely employ IPP (Independent Power Producer) structures with substantial government involvement through state offtakers and sovereign guarantees.


Morocco's wind farms benefit from ONEE (Office National de l'Electricité et de l'Eau potable), the state-owned utility, providing both creditworthy offtake and often direct equity participation.


LTWP's 100% private equity structure—with no government ownership stake—represents a more market-oriented approach. This model demonstrates that purely private capital can finance large renewable infrastructure in Sub-Saharan markets given appropriate risk allocation (sovereign guarantees), development finance catalysis (AfDB, EIB), and robust contractual frameworks.


Policy maturity varies significantly across these markets. Morocco and Egypt have established renewable energy regulatory frameworks, competitive procurement processes, and dedicated agencies (MASEN in Morocco, NREA in Egypt) to advance clean energy deployment.

Kenya's approach at the time of LTWP development relied more on negotiated PPAs for unsolicited proposals, a less structured process that contributed to some of the project's challenges.


The capacity factor comparison highlights LTWP's meteorological advantage. While Egypt's Gulf of Suez facilities also achieve approximately 60% capacity factors due to similarly strong and consistent wind resources, most other African wind farms operate at 30-40% levels typical globally. Morocco's Tarfaya Wind Farm, despite its Saharan location, achieves lower capacity factors due to more variable wind patterns.


Grid integration experiences differ markedly. Egypt's mature transmission system absorbed Gulf of Suez wind power with minimal evacuation constraints. Morocco's grid, strengthened through billions in infrastructure investment, seamlessly integrates renewable generation. Kenya's grid at LTWP commissioning faced capacity constraints requiring careful dispatch coordination, with the 438-kilometer dedicated transmission line representing a prerequisite rather than just a delivery mechanism.



What Lessons Does the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project Offer for Emerging Renewable Markets?


LTWP demonstrates that infrastructure-first strategies prove essential—transmission evacuation must be secured before or concurrent with generation development to avoid costly deemed energy payments.


Risk allocation frameworks should clearly delineate public and private responsibilities, with sovereign entities retaining risks they can best control (transmission, permitting) while private developers manage construction and operational performance. Development finance institutions provide catalytic capital crucial for first-of-kind projects in frontier markets.


The transmission line debacle offers perhaps the clearest lesson: don't build the generation before the evacuation infrastructure is ready. The original plan for LTWP to construct both wind farm and transmission as an integrated project would likely have avoided the Ksh 5.7-18.5 billion in deemed energy payments. When the government separated these components in 2011, it created a critical path dependency without corresponding penalty mechanisms to ensure timely transmission delivery.


Future projects should structure transmission responsibility with consequences. If the public sector retains transmission development, contracts must include liquidated damages for delays equal to or exceeding the deemed generation payments that result. Alternatively, private developers should construct all infrastructure through the grid interconnection point, with utilities responsible only for final integration.


The risk allocation framework must match capabilities to responsibilities. KETRACO accepted transmission accountability but lacked the procurement expertise, contractor oversight capacity, and wayleave negotiation experience needed for successful execution. The Isolux contractor selection process apparently failed to assess the Spanish firm's financial health adequately, contributing to the insolvency disaster.


Private developers demonstrate comparative advantages in EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) management, technology selection, and operational optimization. Public entities typically manage regulatory interfaces, land acquisition, environmental permitting, and grid planning more effectively. Successful PPPs recognize these complementary strengths rather than assigning tasks based on political considerations.


The financial structuring provides a template for future African renewables.

The combination of:

  • Development finance providing catalytic senior debt with patient capital

  • Export credit agencies covering political and commercial risks

  • Blended finance (EU grants) closing viability gaps

  • Commercial bank participation alongside DFIs spreading risks

  • Sovereign guarantees backstopping offtaker credit risk


...creates a replicable architecture for large infrastructure in frontier markets. However, the World Bank withdrawal demonstrates that excessive multilateral caution can delay rather than destroy projects—private and bilateral finance often moves faster than multilateral consensus.


Community engagement must start early and continue throughout project life. LTWP's belated consultations created opposition that litigation and protests could have been minimized through proactive engagement.


The Winds of Change Foundation's €6.5 million in community investments since 2015 demonstrates recognition of this imperative, though it came after conflicts rather than preventing them.


The political economy of renewable procurement requires attention. Parliamentary investigations questioning the transmission responsibility shift highlight how PPP modifications can create corruption vulnerabilities. Transparent competitive procurement, clear decision documentation, and independent oversight reduce both actual malfeasance and perception thereof.


Technology selection should prioritize proven equipment suited to local conditions over cutting-edge turbines. LTWP's choice of Vestas V52 turbines—mature technology designed for high-wind regimes and transportable through Kenya's logistics constraints—proved more appropriate than theoretical larger machines that couldn't reach the site or handle the wind intensity.



Frequently Asked Questions About the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project


Q. Is Lake Turkana Wind Power really the largest wind farm in Africa?

Yes, Lake Turkana Wind Power's 310 MW capacity from 365 turbines makes it Africa's largest single wind farm facility. Egypt's Zafarana Wind Farm has higher total capacity (545 MW) but was developed across eight separate phases between 2000 and 2010, not as a unified project. Morocco's Tarfaya Wind Farm (301 MW) ranks as the second-largest single facility.


Q. Why was the transmission line delayed?

The 438-kilometer transmission line faced a combination of challenges: the Spanish contractor Isolux Corsán filed for insolvency in March 2017 after completing only half the line; KETRACO struggled with wayleave acquisition and land compensation disputes along the route; and coordination issues between the private wind farm and public transmission components created implementation gaps. Emergency retendering to Chinese firms NARI Group and PowerChina completed the line in eight months in 2018.


Q. Did Kenyan taxpayers lose money on the project?

The transmission delays cost taxpayers between Ksh 5.7 billion and Ksh 18.5 billion in "deemed generated energy" payments to LTWP for electricity that couldn't be evacuated during 2017-2018. However, since full operations began, LTWP has displaced approximately Ksh 167 billion worth of fuel imports through 2024, delivering net savings despite the delay penalties. The project provides 10-12% of Kenya's electricity at lower cost than diesel/HFO thermal generation.


Q. How much electricity does the project generate per year?

LTWP generated 1,367 GWh in 2024, representing 10.89% of Kenya's total grid supply that year. Annual generation typically ranges from 1,400-1,600 GWh depending on wind conditions and grid curtailment. Since commencing operations in 2018, the project has contributed over 9.5 billion kWh cumulatively. This powers approximately 1-1.2 million Kenyan households annually.


Q. What is the capacity factor of Lake Turkana Wind Power?

The project averages approximately 60% capacity factor—exceptional by global standards where 30-40% is typical for onshore wind. In March 2021, LTWP recorded its highest monthly capacity factor of 75.8%, demonstrating the world-class quality of the Turkana wind corridor resource. This high capacity factor results from consistent wind speeds averaging 11 m/s created by the low-level Turkana jet meteorological phenomenon.


Q. Who owns the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project?

Lake Turkana Wind Power Limited is owned by four shareholders: Anergi Turkana Investments Limited (43.2%), Osprey Renewables Africa (31.25%), CFP UK Holdings Limited managed by BlackRock Alternatives (25.25%), and Sandpiper Ltd (0.3%). Original investors including Norfund, Finnfund, IFU, and Vestas have sold their stakes to long-term infrastructure investors. The Kenyan government has no equity ownership but guaranteed the Power Purchase Agreement.


Q. How does it affect electricity prices in Kenya?

LTWP's fixed tariff of approximately $0.081/kWh undercuts diesel/HFO thermal generation costing $0.15-0.23/kWh, enabling lower average tariffs for consumers. The project contributed to Kenya reducing fuel cost surcharges on electricity bills. However, the transmission delay penalties were passed to consumers through small tariff adjustments beginning in May 2018. Overall, LTWP provides price stability by reducing Kenya's exposure to volatile international oil markets.


Q. Is the wind resource at Lake Turkana reliable year-round?

Yes, the Turkana jet phenomenon creates year-round consistent winds, unlike many wind resources that exhibit strong seasonal variation. The low-level atmospheric jet between the East African and Ethiopian highlands flows persistently from the southeast through the Rift Valley. Local acceleration between Mount Kulal and Mount Nyiru creates average speeds of 11 m/s throughout all seasons, enabling the exceptional 60% capacity factor and near-baseload reliability.



References & Data Sources

This article is backed by authoritative sources and research:


International Development Finance Institutions:


Project Company and Official Sources:


Industry and Technical Analysis:


Policy Analysis and Research:


Kenyan Media and Parliamentary Sources:


Comparative African Wind Energy Sources:


Project Management and Engineering:



Disclaimer: 

This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. The Lake Turkana Wind Power Project involves complex financial structures, regulatory frameworks, and operational considerations. Readers considering investments in renewable energy projects in Kenya or other emerging markets should conduct thorough due diligence and consult with qualified financial advisors, legal counsel, and technical experts before making investment decisions.


The financial figures, tariff rates, and capacity factors cited reflect conditions at the time of project development and may not represent current market conditions. Renewable energy projects involve risks including regulatory changes, grid integration challenges, currency fluctuations, political instability, and technology performance variability. Past performance of the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project does not guarantee similar outcomes for future renewable energy investments in Africa or elsewhere.


Environmental impact calculations, emissions avoidance figures, and climate benefit claims are based on project operator estimates and publicly available data. Actual environmental performance may vary based on grid dispatch patterns, measurement methodologies, and baseline assumptions. Readers should verify environmental claims through independent sources before relying on them for policy decisions or carbon accounting purposes.


The information in this article has been compiled from publicly available sources believed to be reliable as of February 2026. However, GreenFuelJournal.com makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information presented. Operational data, ownership structures, and financial arrangements may have changed since publication. For the most current information, readers should consult the Lake Turkana Wind Power Limited official website, regulatory filings with Kenyan authorities, and project lender disclosures.


© Green Fuel Journal Research Division | Published: February 2026


GREEN FUEL JOURNAL LOGO


Comments

bottom of page